Pacific Avenue sidepath
An 8-foot sidepath south of Pacific Avenue from Main Street to Overland Road. The council approved an interlocal agreement with Davis County and matching funds on Oct. 6, 2026. Staff put the cost at $575,000, with $460,000 from county transportation funding and a $115,000 local match, and said construction was already under way. Execution of the agreement and reimbursement are not shown.
- Where it stands
- Under construction
- Type
- Public project
- Status evidence date
- Tue, Oct 6
- Location
- Pacific Avenue
Follow the money and project delivery
Pacific Avenue sidepath
- Council action
Under construction according to the dated project source. Record → · Oct. 6, 2026
- Money in the record
grant: $460,000 — County transportation funding for the Pacific Avenue sidepath, reimbursement up to 80% of eligible costs; budget: $115,000 — City matching funds for the Pacific Avenue sidepath Record → · Oct. 6, 2026
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
October 6, 2026 · City Council
Resolution 2026-48R: Pacific Avenue sidepath interlocal agreement with Davis County
Approved · 5-0
The council approved an interlocal agreement with Davis County for the Pacific Avenue sidepath, using county transportation sales tax funding, and authorized matching funds. The packet describes an 8-foot sidepath south of Pacific Avenue from Main Street to Overland Road, with $460,000 of county funding and a $115,000 local match, $575,000 in all, and says the project was already under construction. The unsigned agreement in the packet reimburses up to 80% of eligible costs, not more than $460,000, with a Dec. 31, 2029 completion deadline.
- Basis of outcome: final minutes approved Oct. 20, 2026
- Approval of the city's side; the packet's agreement has blank signature fields, so execution and reimbursement are not shown